<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Web 2.0 Taken Too Far?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lindsayshea.wordpress.com/2008/04/30/web-20-taken-too-far/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lindsayshea.wordpress.com/2008/04/30/web-20-taken-too-far/</link>
	<description>marketing, media, cultural commentary and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 06:13:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: lindsayshea</title>
		<link>http://lindsayshea.wordpress.com/2008/04/30/web-20-taken-too-far/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>lindsayshea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 04:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lindsayshea.wordpress.com/?p=85#comment-44</guid>
		<description>Hi Siddiq, thanks for commenting! I actually quite like the design of Facebook, YouTube, etc - minimalist and user-friendly. What I meant is that it&#039;s a bit jarring to move within what&#039;s supposed to be a single site and see something completely different on every page. They could have easily used the Flickr API, or RSS feeds from their Facebook page to achieve a similar effect (live and evolving content) while still maintaining an overall sense of branding and cohesiveness. But then again, had they not done it this way, it wouldn&#039;t have demonstrated the utilitarian nature of these social media sites so clearly, which was their goal all along :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Siddiq, thanks for commenting! I actually quite like the design of Facebook, YouTube, etc &#8211; minimalist and user-friendly. What I meant is that it&#8217;s a bit jarring to move within what&#8217;s supposed to be a single site and see something completely different on every page. They could have easily used the Flickr API, or RSS feeds from their Facebook page to achieve a similar effect (live and evolving content) while still maintaining an overall sense of branding and cohesiveness. But then again, had they not done it this way, it wouldn&#8217;t have demonstrated the utilitarian nature of these social media sites so clearly, which was their goal all along :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siddiq Bello</title>
		<link>http://lindsayshea.wordpress.com/2008/04/30/web-20-taken-too-far/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Siddiq Bello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 13:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lindsayshea.wordpress.com/?p=85#comment-43</guid>
		<description>Great find. 

However this quote &quot;It is by far the ugliest mish-mash of a website I’ve ever seen.&quot; could use a bit more explaining. Given that none of the sites are designed in the traditional sense by them why do you think its ugly. I think your second point that it highlights a new thinking and demonstrates just how creative one can get in using the web to market a service or company is the key.

Thanks for posting it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great find. </p>
<p>However this quote &#8220;It is by far the ugliest mish-mash of a website I’ve ever seen.&#8221; could use a bit more explaining. Given that none of the sites are designed in the traditional sense by them why do you think its ugly. I think your second point that it highlights a new thinking and demonstrates just how creative one can get in using the web to market a service or company is the key.</p>
<p>Thanks for posting it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook &#187; Web 2.0 Taken Too Far?</title>
		<link>http://lindsayshea.wordpress.com/2008/04/30/web-20-taken-too-far/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook &#187; Web 2.0 Taken Too Far?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 05:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lindsayshea.wordpress.com/?p=85#comment-42</guid>
		<description>[...] AspAdvice - Blogs wrote an interesting post today on Web 2.0 Taken Too Far?Here&#8217;s a quick excerpt&#8230;the top left provides the only branding and secondary pages are served via i-frames: About Us is a combination of wikipedia and Facebook pages; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] AspAdvice &#8211; Blogs wrote an interesting post today on Web 2.0 Taken Too Far?Here&#8217;s a quick excerpt&#8230;the top left provides the only branding and secondary pages are served via i-frames: About Us is a combination of wikipedia and Facebook pages; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
